Comments on: 1 Terabyte per Square inch -Fujitsu’s new nanohole technology http://www.techlivez.com/2007/08/1-terabyte-per-square-inch-fujitsus-new-nanohole-technology/ Wed, 08 Feb 2012 01:04:14 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3 By: charity http://www.techlivez.com/2007/08/1-terabyte-per-square-inch-fujitsus-new-nanohole-technology/#comment-11192 charity Mon, 05 Jan 2009 18:36:56 +0000 http://www.techlivez.com/2007/08/1-terabyte-per-square-inch-fujitsus-new-nanohole-technology/#comment-11192 :shock: omg :shock: omg

]]> By: Jujube Mous http://www.techlivez.com/2007/08/1-terabyte-per-square-inch-fujitsus-new-nanohole-technology/#comment-5359 Jujube Mous Fri, 04 Apr 2008 17:49:08 +0000 http://www.techlivez.com/2007/08/1-terabyte-per-square-inch-fujitsus-new-nanohole-technology/#comment-5359 Hate to be the bearer of bad news, but this isn't quite what it looks like. A look at a Fujitsu Press Release says that it's actually 1 Terabit and not 1 Terabyte. While still extremely impressive, this really only makes it possible to write 125GB/sq. in. This is still pretty good news, especially when supplemented with a recent press release on their upcoming half-terabyte 2.5" hard drive. Jamming 500GB into a laptop HD is pretty impressive these days given that 320GB seems to be the top end at the moment. Even still, it looks like they could easily cross into 1-2TB territory for HDDs by 2010. Hate to be the bearer of bad news, but this isn’t quite what it looks like. A look at a Fujitsu Press Release says that it’s actually 1 Terabit and not 1 Terabyte. While still extremely impressive, this really only makes it possible to write 125GB/sq. in.

This is still pretty good news, especially when supplemented with a recent press release on their upcoming half-terabyte 2.5″ hard drive. Jamming 500GB into a laptop HD is pretty impressive these days given that 320GB seems to be the top end at the moment. Even still, it looks like they could easily cross into 1-2TB territory for HDDs by 2010.

]]>